The Conservative Party and Its Principles

Share:





The United Kingdom or Britain maintains two political parties that are represented in the House of Commons to join parliamentary businesses and matters (Duverger, 1963). In today's parliament, technically there are three parties that dominate the House of Commons – the Conservative and Unionist Party, the Labour Party, and the Liberal Democrats. The Labour and the Liberal Democrats both stand on democratic socialism-liberalism. The entrance of Labour Party on Britain's politics provided the working sector an opportunity to break status quo of the two traditional parties (Williams, 1998).
The Conservative Party, the oldest of Britain's political parties, traced its roots to the Tories of the 17th century. From that time until today, the Conservative Party plays a big role in the British government. Some of the party's prominent leaders who became Prime Ministers include: Margaret Thatcher, John Major, Winston Churchill, and the present Prime Minister, David Cameron.
Like any other party, Conservative also has its own fundamental or basic principles that govern the actions and decisions of its members. These guiding principles define the mindset of its members and representatives in the Parliament, and following the opposite of these principles leads to an exodus out of political conservatism. The fundamental principles of the Conservative Party can be summarized as “the defence of a limited style of politics based upon the idea of imperfection(Ingle, 2006, p. 25).”

Fundamentals of the Conservative Party

Conservatism principles and atmosphere in Britain “has been vigorously contested... to expect a flurry of impassioned speeches and pamphlets setting out rival interpretations (Garnett & Lynch, 2004).” 20th century saw the meltdown of some of the basic ideas behind conservatism in Britain – and since then British conservatism had been threatened and attacked of complete emergence of anti-conservatism principles. Yet, British conservatism was able to hold its grounds and keep its basic fundamental principles.
First, Conservatives believe on the Bill of Rights principle that a person has absolute right to liberty. The intention of conservatism is to ensure assurance of individual liberty by eliminating misuse and abuse of power that may undermine the absolute right to liberty of each person. All other principles and ideas of government of the Conservative Party surround on this first fundamental principle.
Second, conservative members of the Parliament adheres to the basic right of each to ownership as the express spirit of opportunity, freedom and independence. Although this principle among conservatism can be viewed under liberalism, but careful understanding ensures that no ground of socialism will be taken to avoid clash between the right of a person to ownership and the right of the government to ensure equality. Basically, this fundamental principle is an extension of the first principle that assures absolute right to liberty.
With the assurance of absolute liberty, conservatism believes that the same liberty has its own responsibilities toward the nation, fellowmen, and family. This third principle of the Conservative Party attempts to demonstrate a check and balance on the absolute liberty of a person. As quoted in Seawright (2009), former PM Thatcher said:

            “I think we have gone through a period when too many children and people have been given to    understand “I have a problem, it is the Government's job to cope with it”... There is no such     thing! There are individual men and women and there are families and no government can do          anything except through people and people look themselves first...”
British Conservatism balances the stand on liberty with the responsibility of every person toward the society. Otherwise, it would be impossible for the government to survive. It should be that the government ensures liberty, but the government must be provided by individuals. This understanding of balance is enshrined deeply on the fourth principle of government's role on strengthening individual liberty. However, the compete leaning on the right may mean absolute individualism and the loss of patrimony.
In reinforcement of the 2nd conservatism principle, the fifth basic of guideline of the party states the necessity for the government to establish a good environment and atmosphere for establishment of free enterprise. Because each person has the right and opportunity to ownership, the Conservative Party works on the economic and political grounds of free enterprise and capitalism, which is usually contested by social-liberalism of the Liberal Democrats.
Lastly, Conservatism works on defence to ensure that Britain maintains its global strength, as a pathway to extend peace that will ensure the total achievement of all other principles, whether fundamental or auxiliary.

Retention of Conservative Principles

More than 300 years from its original conception, the Conservative Party remained strong and formidable in the Parliament, even making a government of today under its party leader and current Prime Minister David Cameron's victory. And over the past few centuries while the Liberal Party has been divided, which also provided a chance for the Labour Party to emerge as a strong contender in the British politics, the Conservative Party retains its strength and most of its fundamental principles.
During the term of Winston Churchill and Margaret Thatcher, conservatism has been in direct attacks. These periods marked the biggest challenge of the party to maintain their principles. It is a surprise and remarkable how the party maintained its principles, and kept its members in check, especially with dealing with crucial issues in the Parliament.
What had been the secret behind conservatism? To what extent the party isolated and controlled their members within their fundamental principles?
For the British Conservatives, tradition remains a main thing, which is also shunned by the Liberals. Conservatism is defined as the “political philosophy that emphasizes the value of traditional institutions and practices (Boaz, 2008).” Unlike American conservatism that protects traditional institutions but values modern or liberal practices, British conservatism has been consistent on its own definition.
Take for instance Thatcher's response to the Falkland crisis. Conservatism dictates that Falkland is an institution enshrined on the British government, which should be kept, according to Thatcher. In keeping with conservatism principle of defense to ensure protection of all other rights, the prime minister wants to “show that aggression will not succeed and to uphold the cause of freedom (Gibran, 2008, p. 111)”
On this act of Thatcher, the “Conservative government upheld and show a determination to defend... “the right to self-determination,” “sanctity of the British way of life,” and “aggression should not pay.” Perhaps, the strength of Conservatism has been showed and represented by strong and formidable leaders who were able to establish the Conservative Party's principle within the party itself, and the British government policy.
Another point to consider in understanding how far Conservatives went or will go for the retention of their principles is their current coalition with the Liberal Democrats. The Liberal Democrats are considered to be center-radicals, and the Conservatives as the center-right. Even in this situation, Conservatives were still able to build successes, not in opposing change, but to make the process gradual.
For instance, the Conservatives were able to defend and resist change, as a result the monarchy is preserved, but they were able to ready to accept developments of the social and liberal views (McAnulla, 2006). The monarchy becomes more relax and comfortable with people as a result of gradual acceptance of change. The Party was able to keep the traditional institution without suffering pragmatism which could have put progress in the balance.
Recent developments of the British politics have seen how Conservatives are willing to bend their long-held policies for the sake of preserving patrimony and paternalism. In fact, in terms of economics, the Conservative government tends to be more liberal, which is very important to avoid hurting the nation's interest. In this view, the Conservative government must choose between policies or its fundamental principles. And, as always, the fundamental principle wins, as a sign of how willing Conservatives are in sacrificing their policies to preserve and retain their basic principles.
The retention of Conservative Party's principle has been a constant battle between change and stability, the past achievements and the moment, traditional paternalism and libertarianism. Ingle (2006) said that conservatism was able to preserve its principles because of the change it faced. In fact, he noted that “Conservatives were opposed to parliamentary reforms and then became its champion; opposed to Corn Law reform and then became its agent...” to establish the movement of the Conservative party that although they were able to preserve their fundamental or basic principles, they have been in constant battle of accepting change or staying on the status quo. In the end, they were able to accept the need to change without sacrificing the traditional principles they hold.
Perhaps, the history of the Conservative Party is a complete story of their party identity that's more than their ideology. This is how they maneuver to keep their pace in this changing political environment, and even create alliance with people from the opposite fence without changing lines and stands. And this is the secret behind the formidable strength and endurance of the Conservative Party's fundamental principles that still guide every single member in the Parliament, and even the current Prime Minister, Conservative Party Chairman David Cameron.

References:


Boaz, D., 2008. The Politics of Freedom: Taking on the Left, the Right, and Threats to Our Liberties. Cato Institute.
Duverger, M., 1963. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. Taylor & Francis.
Garnett, M. & Lynch, P., 2004. The Conservatives in Crisis. Manchester University Press.
Gibran, D., 2008. The Falklands War: Britain Versus the Past in the South Atlantic. McFarland.
Ingle, S., 2008. The British Party System: An Introduction. 4th and revised ed. Taylor & Francis.
McAnulla, S., 2006. British Politics: A Critical Introduction. Continuum International Publishing Group.
Seawright, D., 2009. The British Conservative Party and One Nation Politics. Continuum International Publishing Group.

Williams, A., 1998. UK Government & Politics. 2nd edition. Heinemann.